Tuesday, 28 June 2016

In Brands We Trust

Tata La Vida books over 200 flats costing Rs 300 crore in just 10 days. Can Godrej recreate the  magic in Noida, Greater Noida? 


Elevating the aesthetic of the Dwarka Expressway neighbourhood comes Tata La Vida featuring orchards, lily ponds and tree-canopied skywalk and sells over 200 flats in just 10 days!Wow!Considering the starting price of these units is Rs 1.08 crore and the market is down in the dumps as we all know, it's a remarkable feat indeed. Now the question is: will the other Mumbai-based realty firm, Godrej, meet the same response when it formally launches its Noida and Greater Noida projects? Only time will tell. Next year, UP also goes to polls and a lot will depend on the election outcome also. After tying up with Lotus Greens for its first housing project in the Noida real estate district at Sector-150, Godrej Properties has now partnered with Rudra AR Landcraft LLP to develop a golf-centric township in Greater Noida.The 36-acre low density project with a 9-hole golf course and villas will come up at Sector-27, next to the under-construction Amrapali-O2 project called The Hemisphere. “Greater Noida is an important part of the NCR market and this project fits well with our strategy of deepening our presence across the country’s leading real estate markets,” said Pirojsha Godrej, Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer at Godrej Properties. The Greater Noida property market has performed better than other locations in the National Capital Region (NCR) over the last three years. At present, Godrej Properties is developing residential, commercial and township projects spread across about 119 million sqft in 12 cities. It had entered the Noida market in January this year with a development management agreement with Lotus Greens to build a housing project on 36-acre land parcel at Sector-150 of Noida. It had also recently tied up with real estate developer Ramprastha in a joint development agreement for a project in Sector-89 of Gurgaon. This will be GPL’s seventh project in NCR. Meanwhile, construction activities at The Hemisphere are going on at good speed. The project will have villas with 3, 4 and 5 BHK options with plot sizes starting from 100 square yards to the biggest being 275 square yards. The Hemisphere will have multiple luxury clubs, shopping complex called Alphasphere, a full- fledged sports complex, a wellness centre, banquet halls, hi-tech cloud-based security and more. Melbourne-based Pacific Coast Design has been hired as the golf course design company, which is responsible for site master plan, strategic golf architecture and innovative design solutions. Internationally acclaimed Khan Global comprising a team of over 200 architects and engineers from across the globe, including US, Spain, and the UK are The Hemisphere Architects & Planners.  

Supertech to hand over maintenance to Emerald Court

The real issue will be handling of IFMS money running into crores

Those who think buying a flat after due diligence is the safest way to go, must google and read stories about how builders can make your life miserable once you shift in your brand new home. In several cases, the RWA which is formed during the developer's time, can also play that role. Again, it's not always the developer who gets his sympathisers to form the RWA as it happened in Purvanchal Silvercity II case in Greater Noida where a handful of residents with mala fide intentions formed the association to finally get dissolved by Allahabad High Court. It's always the society funds running into crores that make these Realtors and dubious RWAs to cling on to maintenance, housekeeping and of course, security which alone costs a crore-plus to a normal socierty with let's say, 70 guards manning 15-16 highrises.That's a lot of money but hold on, there are two other major money earning avaneues: IFMS (interest free maintenance security, or sinking fund),and electricity recharge.Almsot all societies have single point connection these days, which means NPCL or UPPCL sends a single bill to the society. The RWA or the builder collects the money through recharge coupons issued according to electricity consumption.In the IFMS case, the money is deposited in a fixed deposit.But if the RWA wants to play dirty,it can take a loan against the fund or simply finish it off by hiding the fact from residents.Those who raise their voice against such corrupt practices are physically assaulted by hired goons. But that's another story for some other time. As for power recharge money,residents realise after three months that the RWA never deposited the money to the power company when the society power is cut.Silvercity II, AVJ Heightss and several other societies are proof it happens.Back to story of the day, Supertech Emerald Court residents protested recently and forced the builder to hand over maintenance to its RWA.You'll remember the RWA of the housing society in Sector 93A had earlier taken on the developer on the construction of two residential towers in Phase-2 of the project - Apex and Ceyane - which they alleged was against building norms.A legal battle followed, and the Allahabad High Court ordered the two towers demolished. The case has since moved to the Supreme Court, which has stayed the HC order as it holds hearings.Supertech conveyed its decision to hand over maintenance to the RWA after a sit-down demonstration by around 200 residents of the society, which saw its first occupants move in eight years ago, though it wasn't another six years till the RWA was formed.The residents also demanded transfer of all maintenance funds that they have given to the builder.The Supertech management also agreed to transfer accounts and relevant documents to the RWA.So far so good but the real problem that we see is the IFMS money running into Rs 8 crore (approx), which might start ugly fights between different factions of the RWA. We just hope the present RWA is able to take all residents along on the issue as they did during the twin towers' issue. All the best, but it's not going to be easy, mind it.  




Monday, 27 June 2016

The Mist-erious Tower

Eight months after start of construction, Mist also goes slow

The Bhasins of the Grand Venice Mall (still under construction in Greater Noida) swore they'll complete the 33-storey steel composite tower in Sector-143, Noida, in three months flat - which meant building one floor in three days.Launched in October last,this is where it stands today. Btw, Bhasins' neighbour on Expressway, Unnati, also signed a similar pact in steel with Jindals but we don't see anything happening on the ground. 

50,000 unregistered flatowners face Noida Authority wrath

Authority plans legal action against erring builders, buyers for living in flats without OC


Noida buyers are caught between the devil and the deep sea. Even after paying the full amount towards their flats to the developer, they are being hounded by the Noida Authority for living in unregistered flats. Homebuyers said they are suffering for no fault of theirs. “We are at the receiving end even after paying for the flat in full. The builder has failed to obtain OC and get registry execution done, not us,” said Manoj Kumar Sharma, a buyer. These homebuyers could not get registration done because their builders had failed to obtain occupancy certificates (OC). A registry cannot be executed without an OC. The Gautam Budh Nagar district administration has directed its stamp and registration department to identify developers who had not obtained OC and executed registries. “I have directed sub-registrars to conduct a survey and submit a report on the number of group housing towers and the exact number of buyers who moved into housing units without execution of registry of flats,” said S.K. Singh, Assistant Inspector General (AIG), UP Stamp and Registration Department, Noida. “Our survey will find out homebuyers and builders, who have not executed their registry. We will take action on a case to case basis,” said N.P. Singh, District Magistrate Gautam Budh Nagar. As per the Noida Authority’s estimate, around 50,000 homebuyers have moved into flats without registering them. As per norms, during execution of registry of a property, a buyer has to pay 5% of the total cost of the flat as stamp duty to the Government. If buyers shift into their new flats without registry, the Government fails to get the revenue. The department said it will take legal action against erring buyers and builders who had given possession of flats flouting norms. As per UP Apartment Act, 2010, a builder cannot offer possession of a flat to a buyer without obtaining occupancy certificate for a building. According to the Noida Authority, once a building’s civil work is ready, a builder has to obtain clearances from fire department, develop required civic facilities before applying for OC. “Once the application of the builder is with us for OC. We check all necessary documents. We also issue a public notice in newspapers inviting objections from buyers. We address buyers’ objections if there is any and issue OC,” said S.C. Gaur, Chief Architect and Town Planner of the Noida Authority. Issuance of occupation certificate is an important step as it enables a builder to offer possession of housing unit to a buyer and also execute property registration. Without an occupation Certificate, a builder can neither offer possession to the buyer nor execute property registration of a housing unit. The authority, which would otherwise take a few months in issuing OC, is now quick in its job, thanks to Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav stepping in for distraught buyers, who have been staging protests for delay in completion of residential projects. As per Noida’s building by-laws occupancy certificate, which is also called completion certificate, is issued after detailed investigation by the planning department. A buyer can shift to his dwelling unit and also execute registry only after OC. The Noida Authority also issues temporary occupation certificate (TOC) to a building for a certain period with some riders. But with TOC a buyer can take possession of dwelling unit for limited time, but cannot execute registry, which is a means to transfer property title. On March 2, the Uttar Pradesh Government in a cabinet decision increased the property registration fee from existing 5 per cent of total property cost to 7 per cent in Noida and Greater noida bringing it on par with other districts in the state. However, the hike will be effective only when the UP Governor issues a notification which is yet to happen.

Thursday, 22 October 2015

Importance of DoD in RWA voting

One of the most striking features of UP Apartment Act 2010 is the mandatory Deeds of Declaration (DOD) from the builder that discloses in writing the building(s) as well as the entire parcel of land to the residents

The recent Allahabad High Court order in the Purvanchal Silvercity II, Greater Noida, case has once again brought the Deeds of Declaration (DoD) in focus. Hon’ble Justice Suneet Kumar ruled that elections in the residential complex will be strictly based on DoD. So in case you thought the election to the apartment owners association was as simple as one person from one flat casting his/her vote, think again. The truth is each resident’s voting share depends on the size of the flat he occupies, besides the undivided share in common areas. Loosely translated, it means if you own a big size flat, your voting share will be more than your pal who lives in a smaller apartment. But what exactly is a DoD and why is it so important? It is basically the document by which the builder admits in writing (true disclosure) of what is built on site. It includes area statements regarding the apartments, common areas and facilities, independent and limited common areas and facilities and the details of the materials used for construction. It’s vide the Deed of Declaration that the builder also ‘conveys’ the building(s) as well as the entire parcel of land to the residents. It’s an important piece of document because it tells homeowners the exact layout plans of the plot and the promoter cannot change the scheme without the written consent of all the allottees. It also means that the apartment owners association also can’t decide with majority vote to build a temple or any other structure on common area without everyone’s consent. Just to add, none of the Noida developers have submitted a DoD to the authority. Neighbouring Indirapuram residents will also recall getting notices by the Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA) in September last that their flats will be seized unless DoD were submitted to the civic agency. The notices took homeowners by surprise as the so-called deeds had to be submitted by their housing societies, not individual flats. But for the GDA, the move to serve individual notices was perhaps meant more as a pressure tactic. It worked, too, as developers of more than 50 housing societies quickly submitted the deeds. But why does the builder need to submit it to the authority?
The Backgrounder: Housing is a necessity for all human beings and it’s the government’s responsibility to provide shelter to all its citizens. However, the government being constrained by resources looks towards private developers to construct group housing complexes and condominiums by which everyone benefits – the citizens, the government (revenues by plot auction, FAR sale and stamp duty) and obviously the builders. We all know that the development authority is allotted land by the state government for urban development as per the approved master plan, which comprises residential, commercial, institutional, recreational, sports and green areas. The areas meant for residential development is auctioned at lower rates vis-à-vis area earmarked for commercial development. It is, therefore, expected that private builders will construct group housing projects and hand over the management of the buildings and parcels of land to the residents, represented by the Association of Apartment Owners or Residents Welfare Associations, and move out of the condominiums.
The provision for Deed of Declaration is stipulated under Section 12 of the UP Apartment Act, 2010, and governed under Rule 3 of the UP Apartment Rules, 2011, and it can only be amended with permission of Competent Authority under Rule 4 of 2011 Rules. The Hon’ble Allahabad High Court passed a landmark judgment under Civil Misc. Writ Petition 33826 of 2012 on 14.11.2013, which ironed out the creases for effective and expeditious implementation of 2010 Act in the state. The court has comprehensively dealt with the Deed of Declaration subject within the 14 conclusions it has drawn in paragraph 65 of the order.

Residents’ Rights

1. The Deed of Declaration is a must for securing the following rights of every resident:
a) Land Rights – i.e., undivided rights over parcel of land;
b) Voting Rights – proportionate to the builder’s sale deed value of the apartment (not the subsequent sale deed value).

2. Covered Area compliance: area mentioned in declaration and sale deed should be same. In case builder has erred, it can be amended under Rule 4 and only by consent of residents, the amendment can be finalized by the competent authority. For obvious vested commercial interests, builders will not willingly submit the Deed of Declaration. However, it is in the interest of residents that under the provision of UP Apartment 2010 Act and the High Court judgment, the development authority and the builder can be compelled to submit the declaration and protect the apartment owners’ statutory rights.

True disclosure of the project
According to the UP Apartment 2010 Act:
(2) Declaration has to be filed by all promoters within 12 months from the date of approval of building plan and within 90 days for constructed or under-construction buildings.
(3) Promoter cannot change the scheme without the written consent of all the allottees.
(1) The ‘competent authority’ includes vice chairman of the development or the collector of the district. In case of the industrial development authority the competent authority shall be the chief executive officer (CEO) of the industrial development authority.
(2) For the purposes of discharging functions and duties and resolving the disputes the competent authority will be entitled to delegate its powers to an officer not below the rank of joint secretary, including legal advisor of the authority and any sub divisional magistrate of the district in case of a district.
(3) The competent authority will also be entitled to verify the contents of the declaration under Section 12 of the UP Apartment Act, 2010, and to decide any question, which may arise out of such declaration.
(4) Any dispute raised before the competent authority shall be decided by the competent authority or delegatee as provided above or his delegatee as provided above, to be decided by the officer notified by the state government under Section 27 (2) and (3) of the Act, before it is brought before the Court of law.
(1) After the enforcement of the UP Apartment Act, 2010, no builder, promoter can resist/ or delay the formation of association of apartment owners under Section 14 of the Act.
(2) If the promoter does not get the association registered, the apartment owners can get it registered after a notice giving some time to the promoter and adopt model bylaws. In this case the registrar of societies shall not refuse the registration of the association of the apartment owners.
(3) The promoter, however, has to be made a member as he is jointly responsible with the apartment owners to form an association. Even if he does not get the association registered and does not join or his authorised agents subscribe to be members of the association, he will be deemed to be member of the association for the purposes of enforcement of the Act as the promoter being the member of the association has duties and liabilities under the Act which he has to enforce.
 


(1) Promoters will have to disclose all details of the project and common assets to buyer before allotment.
Competent Authority
About formation of AOAs
Conclusion:
The Deed of Declaration is as important and valuable as the apartment sale deed. Since we residents pay as per ‘Super Area’, value for money for the apartment flows via the undivided land rights and voting rights over the entire parcel of land on which the group housing project is constructed. The 2010 Act and Hon’ble High Court has provided substantial rights to the residents, which needs to be effectively used to seek value of our hard earned money!


Wednesday, 21 October 2015

Purvanchal Silvercity II RWA illegal, non-entity: HC



In a landmark judgment that will have far-reaching implications on the way gated communities are managed, the Allahabad High Court has declared the RWA at Purvanchal Silvercity II, Greater Noida, illegal and a non-entity. Ordering fresh elections within six weeks under the CEO, Greater Noida, Hon’ble Justice Suneet Kumar ruled, “The constitution of the petitioner-Board of Management is illegal, therefore, would not have a right or authority to manage the affairs of the RWA.” The court ruled that the CEO, or any officer authorised by him not below the rank of Joint Secretary, shall call a joint meeting of the apartment owners and the promoters for the purpose of forming an association of apartment owners. “The association so formed in the said meeting after adopting the Model Bye-laws shall make an application before the concerned Registrar for registration and the association so formed, with the elected office bearers, shall be registered along with bye-laws adopted. After the association is registered, the CEO shall proceed to consider granting recognition to said association,” the court ruled. The court also said that the competent authority as well as the District Authorities shall ensure that no outsider or external bodies, including associations shall be permitted to interfere in the election of the Association. “The Senior Superintendent of Police, Gautam Budh Nagar, shall provide requisite police force, if necessary, on the request of the CEO, Greater NOIDA,” the Hon’ble judge said. “It is provided that the entire exercise as directed herein above shall be concluded within six weeks from the date of service of certified copy of this order,” he said. The RWA, which was incorporated on September 28, 2010, under the Act 1860, never adopted the prescribed Model Bye-laws of UP Apartment Act, 2010. The court observed that no meeting of the general body of RWA was ever convened to adopt the Model Bye-laws. Instead, the RWA Board, which never conducted any elections all these years, made 28 amendments to the Model Bye-laws without 2/3rd majority of the members and approval of the competent authority. The court also noted that cancellation of the registration and the bye-laws of the petitioner-society by the Deputy Registrar Societies earlier, made the petitioner society a non-entity. The court held that mere issuance of registration certificate by the Deputy Registrar without registering the bye-laws, which in the present case has been cancelled, cannot lead to the conclusion that the petitioner-society is registered under the provisions of the Act. Highlighting the important function of the competent authority assigned under Act 2010, the court said, “In the present case, due to the ongoing dispute the use of common area and facilities by the members have suffered as the petitioner has cut/stalled access to several amenities available to the members. The competent authority is bound to ensure better administration of the property which, inter alia, would require constitution of Board of Management as per Model Bye-laws.” Quoting various judgments, the Court ruled that electoral roll has to be prepared strictly in accordance with the provision of Act 2010, Rule 2011 and Model Bye-laws.


Monday, 5 October 2015

0 to 33 in 99 days!

Witness a revolution at Mist Towers, which is part of the much-hyped Festival City (whatever that means) on Expressway! The promoters, Bhasins of the VW dealership fame (or defame now), have seemingly taken a big gamble with the construction of the 33-storey building in Sector-143. They swear to complete the edifice in 99 days flat, which means building ground to 33rd floor in just 99 days, or one floor in three days. I saw the advert on September 23, but I’m yet to see the building four floors up. Maybe they’ll make up for it: 0-60 in just 3.5 seconds! They haven’t told anyone as to how they’re going to accomplish the feat. I hope they do something about Grand Venice, too. Instead of changing its name every few years.